The Persuasive Techniques of Anomali Coffee Advertisements on Instagram Posts

Authors

  • Syahriati Syahriati Politeknik Maritim AMI Makassar
  • Andi Ernie Zaenab Musa Politeknik Maritim AMI Makassar
  • Andi Rustan Politeknik Maritim AMI Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijer.v2i4.447

Keywords:

Anomali Coffee, Digital Advertising, Instagram, Lamb’s Taxonomy, Persuasive Language

Abstract

This study explores the persuasive linguistic techniques used in 50 Instagram advertisements by Anomali Coffee, a prominent Indonesian specialty coffee brand. The research aims to identify and analyze the linguistic strategies embedded in captions, hashtags, slogans, and textual elements in promotional visuals using Lamb’s (2011) 21 category persuasive language framework. A descriptive qualitative approach was adopted for this purpose. The analysis reveals 46 instances of persuasive techniques, with the most common being inclusive language, imagery, hyperbole, connotation, and colloquial expressions. These findings suggest that Anomali Coffee strategically employs emotional engagement, community oriented language, and sensory appeals to strengthen brand identity and resonance. Additionally, credibility enhancing strategies such as expert opinion and evidence are also evident. The study contributes to the application of Lamb’s taxonomy in Indonesian digital marketing, particularly in the specialty coffee industry, showing how linguistic persuasion can amplify consumer interaction on social media platforms. However, the study’s focus on a single brand and textual features limits its generalizability. Future research should consider cross brand comparisons, multimodal analyses, and consumer response studies to further explore the effectiveness of persuasive techniques. Overall, the findings offer valuable insights into the role of persuasive language in shaping digital marketing strategies for local coffee brands in Indonesia.

References

Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students. Social Media + Society,

Cook, G. (2001). The discourse of advertising (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). ‘Instafamous’ credibility and self-presentation of micro-celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1438491

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.

Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 462–482). Cambridge University Press.

Goddard, A (2002). The Language of advertising (2nd.)Routledge.

Indrawati, & Putri, N. R. (2018). Consumer behavior in Indonesia’s digital marketing landscape. Journal of Indonesian Marketing Science, 10(2), 112–129.

Kapoor, K., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Patil, P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Nerur, S. (2018). Advances in social media research: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 531–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9810-y

Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Mental imagery. In K. L. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 167–182). Cambridge University Press.

Labrecque, L. I. (2020). Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 52, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.002

Lamb, M. (2011). Persuasive language in media texts. Cambridge University Press.

McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438.

O’Keefe, D. J. (2016). Persuasion: Theory and research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1–2), 113–136.

Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281.

Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059

Tuten, T., & Solomon, M. (2018). Social media marketing. Sage Publications.

Wahyuningbyas, N. (2018). Persuasion in marketing communication: Creating alignment between message and audience. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(2), 145–156.

Widiastuti, W. (2024). An Analysis of Language Style Used in Skincare Product Advertisements on Youtube. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 4(1), 6776-6785.

Widiastuti, W., Ilmi, N., & Idris, A. M. S. (2025). Analisis semiotika pola-pola bahasa iklan pada media sosial dalam meningkatkan pariwisata di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 5(4), 7531–7541.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Syahriati Syahriati, Andi Ernie Zaenab Musa, & Andi Rustan. (2025). The Persuasive Techniques of Anomali Coffee Advertisements on Instagram Posts. International Journal of Educational Research, 2(4), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijer.v2i4.447