Development of a School-Based Performance Management Model to Enhance Teacher Effectiveness in the Education 4.0 Era

Irmawati Tahir; Nurasia Natsir; Firdaus Firdaus

doi:10.62951/ijer.v3i2.507

Authors

Irmawati Tahir Universitas Muhammadiyyah Makassar
Nurasia Natsir Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Pelamonia
Firdaus Firdaus Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijer.v3i2.507

Keywords:

Education 4.0, Instructional Quality, Performance Management Model, Professional Development, School-Based Management, Teacher Effectiveness

Abstract

In the Education 4.0 era, schools face unprecedented challenges in managing teacher performance effectively. Traditional top-down performance management systems have proven inadequate for fostering continuous professional growth, intrinsic motivation, and adaptive teaching competencies required in increasingly technology-driven learning environments. This study aims to develop, validate, and assess the effectiveness of a School-Based Performance Management (SBPM) model designed to enhance teacher effectiveness across cognitive, affective, and pedagogical dimensions. Using a Research and Development (R&D) design following the ADDIE framework, the study was conducted in three phases: needs analysis, model development, and model validation. Participants included 12 school principals, 186 teachers, and 8 education experts from 24 public secondary schools in [Province, Country]. Validation by experts yielded a content validity index (CVI) of 0.91. Implementation resulted in statistically significant improvements in teacher effectiveness scores (t = 8.74, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.23), digital pedagogy competency (mean increase = 22.4%), and student learning outcomes (mean improvement = 17.8%). The SBPM model provides a contextually responsive, evidence-based framework that empowers schools to manage teacher performance collaboratively, fostering professional accountability and sustainable instructional quality in Education 4.0.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Caldwell, B. J. (2005). School-based management. International Academy of Education / International Institute for Educational Planning.

Cheng, Y. C. (2009). Hong Kong educational reforms in the last decade: Reform syndrome and new developments. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540910926439

Danielson, C. (2013). The framework for teaching evaluation instrument (2013 ed.). The Danielson Group.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A. E., & Pease, S. R. (2012). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context. Review of Educational Research, 53(3), 285–328. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053003285

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.

Fullan, M. (2020). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Garet, M. S., Heppen, J. B., Walters, K., Parkinson, J., Smith, T. M., Song, M., & Borman, G. D. (2016). Focusing on mathematical knowledge: The impact of content-intensive teacher professional development (NCEE 2016-4010). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2011.625111

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 made simple: Ideas for teaching. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). Forms and effects of school-based management. Educational Policy, 12(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904898012003006

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., & Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. ASCD.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mulyasa, E. (2019). Manajemen dan kepemimpinan kepala sekolah. Bumi Aksara.

OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en

Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.

Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers (3rd ed.). ASCD.

Stronge, J. H., & Hindman, J. L. (2006). The teacher quality index: A protocol for teacher selection. ASCD.

Suyanto. (2020). Manajemen pendidikan untuk practitioner pendidikan. Gava Media.

Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Open University Press.

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938