Global Human Resource Management in Improving Corporate Competitiveness.

Yasman Yasman; Limgiani Limgiani

doi:10.62951/ijeepa.v2i1.120

Authors

Yasman Yasman Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
Limgiani Limgiani Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62951/ijeepa.v2i1.120

Keywords:

Global Human Resource, Management, Corporate Performance

Abstract

Human Resource Management (HRM) has become essential to a company's success in the global marketplace in the fast-paced age of globalisation. Global HRM is an approach that takes into account global elements like market demands, labour laws, and cultural norms. Managing scattered teams, adjusting to cultural diversity, and differing labour laws are among the difficulties. Global HRM does, however, also offer advantages, such as easier access to talent from throughout the world. This journal attempts to offer useful insights for HRM practitioners and business executives in managing human resources in the age of globalisation through in-depth examination.Literature reviews serve as the data source for the qualitative and descriptive research methodology. The study's findings emphasise how crucial global human resource management is to accomplishing corporate objectives in a variety of international marketplaces. Flexibility, efficient resource management, improving cultural sensitivity, and employee participation are some of the suggested remedies. In the age of global business, companies can improve performance and accomplish their objectives by putting in place efficient HRM strategies.

References

Alkusani, A., & Sukaris, S. (2019). The influence of job-engagement on withdrawal behavior through commitment organization. Pomfret Widya Research Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 43-51.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Procedure study: A practical approach. Jakarta: Creative Mind.

Cane, S. (1998). Kaizen strategy for winning through people: How to create a human resource program to win competition and profit. Batam: Interaksara.

Dobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations: The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539-559.

Gaspersz, V. (2002). Guidelines for implementing integrated six sigma programs with ISO 9001: 2000, MBNQA, and HACCP. Jakarta: Gramedia Library.

Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2005). Operations management. Jakarta: Salemba Four.

Knox, S. (2002). In V. Flavian (Ed.), Analysis of the development of product innovation culture in footwear companies in Sidoarjo. Journal of Innovation Culture, AGORA, 4(2), 16.

Krisna, A. E. (2024). Implementation of strategic human resource management through HR training: A study at Widya Karya Catholic University. PPIMAN: Center for Management Science Publication, 2(1), 161-171.

Miles, B. M., & Huberman, M. (1992). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Jakarta: UIP.

Moleong, L. J. (2016). Qualitative research methodology (Revised ed.). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rediyono, U., Kusumaningrum, M., Wismono, F. H., & Amarullah, R. (2018). Actualization of innovation culture in public sector organizations. Borneo Administrator Journal, 14(3), 252-265.

Smalley, A., & K, I. (2011). Toyota Kaizen methods. Jakarta: Gradient Mediatama.

Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Sukaris, S., Prathiwi, M. P., & Pristyadi, B. (2020). Improving employee performance through engagement, organizational culture, and leadership style. Equilibrium: Journal of Economics-Management-Accounting, 16(1), 15-21.

Wan Ismail, W. K., & Majid, A. (2007). Framework of the culture of innovation: A revisit. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9, 38-49.